Today’s task is about him. So, take a look at the image below and tell us who the culprit is among the characters featured.
You can test your wits below.
The state of the puzzle states that it was a hot summer day.
However, instead of enjoying his vacation, Inspector Warnicke had to do his job.
So, together with his assistant, the detective pursued the criminal.
As a result of the chase, the men came to the bank of a small but deep and fast river.
Several young people appeared before them. When asked where the suspect might have gone, they pointed to another guy coming out from the opposite bank of the river.
To get there, well-meaning young men were willing to share their boat.
Only Warnicke already knew that he had found his goal.
Question: why didn’t the detective chase the guy on the opposite bank and who is the criminal in this case?
At first glance, the inspector’s actions seem completely illogical.
However, attentive users on the network have already guessed the reason for his decision.
As you can see, you need to read the puzzle conditions more carefully.
After all, as mentioned earlier, the river was fast.
In this case, as you may have guessed, the swimmer, no matter how hard he wanted, could not get out of the river in front of the place where the detective was.
Of course, the culprit will be the river current, which will carry the suspect much further downstream.
Which means the suspect is right here, in front of Warnicke and his assistant. But who is to blame?
And here the respondents do not agree. It seems impossible to answer the question in the absence of other initial data.
However, Internet users never tire of guessing about who it could be.
As a result, serious battles suddenly broke out.
Fortunately, the solution is much simpler. All the young people in the foreground are accomplices.
After all, you are unlikely to protect the first person you meet who is being pursued by law enforcement, right?
Admit it, did you come to the same answer? Don’t forget to share your result in the comments.